The Emergency Section, as a forward-looking position for hospitals, is constantly facing the challenge of various infectious diseases. Rapid, accurate and reasonable antibacterial treatment is a critical link in saving patients ‘ lives and controlling the spread of infection. This paper will explore in depth antibacterial strategies in the treatment of infections in emergency care and will be analysed in the context of actual cases.
I. Types and characteristics of common infections in emergency care
1. Respiratory infections: Respiratory infections account for a significant proportion of patients in emergency care. Pneumonia, for example, can be caused by pathogens such as bacteria (pneumococcus, pneumococcus, etc.), viruses (influenza virus, new coronary virus, etc.) or paragens. Such patients are often characterized by fever, cough, cough and respiratory problems. Among them, community access to pneumonia is common among healthy people with pathogenic micro-organisms outside the hospital, while access to the hospital for pneumonia occurs mostly among inpatients, usually associated with reduced lung defence mechanisms caused by, inter alia, the use of medical devices and long-term bed rest. For example, an elderly patient who suffered from a decline in post-influenza immunity was then given a golden pneumococcal pneumonia, with signs of high fever, coughing and sepsis, and was sent to emergency care.
2. Infection of the urology system: also one of the common infections in emergency care. Bacillus is the main bacteria that causes infections in the urinary system, most of which are caused by urinary arteries. Patients often show symptoms such as frequent urination, excrement, pain and blood urination, which can be accompanied by fever and back pain in serious cases. Women are more likely than men to have urinary system infections due to their shorter and straight urinary tracts. For example, a young woman who suffers from acute bladder disease as a result of poor drinking water and poor hygiene has been treated in a timely manner in the emergency section.
II. Antibacterial treatment principles and strategies
1. Rapid diagnosis and pathogen identification: The emergency physician must, within a short period of time, make an initial determination of the type of infection through the patient ‘ s symptoms, signs, laboratory examinations (e.g., blood protocol, blood culture, curry culture, urine culture, etc.) and, as far as possible, determine the pathogen. Rapid diagnosis facilitates the timely initiation of accurate antibacterial treatment and reduces complications and mortality. For example, for patients suspected of septicaemia, blood culture is performed in a timely manner and the experiential use of broad spectrum antibacterial drugs is used before the results are produced, and once the pathogen is identified, it is adjusted to sensitive antibacterial drugs based on the sensitivity test.
Empirical antibacterial treatment and individualization programmes: Empirical antibacterial treatment based on infected areas, common pathogens and local epidemiological information is required until the pathogen is identified. In the case of community access to pneumonia, young adults with non-basic diseases can opt for antibiotics such as penicillin or headgillin, while in the case of older persons with basic diseases or persons with severe pneumonia, a wider range of powerful antibacterial drugs, such as carbon carcylacne, are chosen. At the same time, individualized treatment programmes are developed taking into account the age of the patient, liver and kidney function, and the history of allergies.
III. Case analysis
A 65-year-old male, with a history of diabetes, was sent to emergency care for high fever, cough, cough and respiratory difficulties. The examination found that the patient had a temperature of 39.5 °C, 30 breaths/mins, that the lung had a wet voice, that the blood pattern showed a significant increase in white and neutral particle cells, and that the chest X-line indicated a massive inflammation of the lung. The doctor initially diagnosed the community with acute pneumonia. Taking into account the age of the patient and the underlying disease, before the results of the stinging are obtained, the empirical treatment of the joint mossaic sodium sodium sulphate, as well as the treatment of the aerobics, thorium et al. After three days of treatment, the patient ‘ s symptoms were not significantly abated, and the stinging results showed an infection of the methoxysilin-yellen fungus (MRSA). The doctor adapted to the pharmacinological test for the treatment of Vungucin while strengthening the control of blood sugar in patients. After a week of intensive treatment, the patient ‘ s temperature gradually returned to normal, his/her breathing was calm and his/her pneumonia was clearly absorbed.
The case shows that anti-bacterial treatment in emergency care requires close observation of the evolution of the condition on the basis of empirical medication, timely adjustment of the programme to the results of pathogen tests, and a combination of factors such as the patient ‘ s basic illness, in order to achieve optimal treatment.
Antibacterial treatment in emergency care is a battle against time and against pathogens. It is only through strict adherence to the principles of treatment, the flexible application of strategies and the continuous learning of experience that the battle can be won and the health of patients protected.
