How to preliminarily judge the benign and malignant nodules through the examination report?

In medical practice, nodules found by imaging often require further evaluation to determine whether they are benign or malignant. The following are some preliminary judgment methods based on imaging examination reports, but please note that these methods can not replace the diagnosis of professional doctors, and the final diagnosis needs to be combined with clinical information, laboratory tests, pathological examinations and other data.

Type

of imaging examination First of all, we need to understand that common imaging examinations of nodules include:

-X-ray examination: lung nodules can be found, but the details of the nodules are poorly displayed.

-Computed tomography (CT): provides more detailed features of the nodule, including size, shape, density, etc.

-Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): higher resolution of soft tissue, often used to evaluate nodules in areas such as the brain and liver.

-Ultrasonography: It is often used for the evaluation of nodules in superficial organs such as thyroid and breast.

-Positron Emission Tomography (PET): can assess the activity of the nodule and is often used to stage the tumor.

Characteristic analysis

of nodules The following are the key features of benign and malignant nodules preliminarily judged by imaging examination reports:

1. Size

-Benign nodules: usually small, less than 3mm in diameter.

-Malignant nodules: usually large, greater than 8 mm in diameter. However, not all large nodules are malignant and need to be combined with other features.

2. Edge

-Benign nodule: the margin is smooth and clear.

-Malignant nodules: margins are usually irregular and rough, with lobulated or spiculated signs.

3. Shape

-Benign nodules: usually regular in shape, such as round or oval.

-Malignant nodules: most are irregular in shape and may be lobulated.

4. density

-Benign nodules: they are homogeneous and may contain calcifications, which are usually central or diffuse.

-Malignant nodule: Uneven density and may contain eccentric or fine sand-like calcifications.

5. Enhance performance

-Benign nodules: Indistinct or homogeneous enhancement on contrast-enhanced scans.

-Malignant nodules: On contrast enhanced scans, there is usually inhomogeneous enhancement with marked enhancement at the margins.

6. growth rate

-Benign nodules: they grow slowly and do not change much.

-Malignant nodule: It grows rapidly and increases significantly in size in a short period of time.

7. PET Scan

-Benign nodules: often present with low uptake of FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose).

-Malignant nodules: usually present with high uptake of FDG.

Comprehensive assessment

When analyzing the imaging examination report, the following factors should be considered comprehensively:

1. Medical history and clinical signs

. -Patient’s age, smoking history, family history of cancer, occupational exposure history, etc.

-Symptoms of nodules, such as pain, bleeding, infection, etc.

2. Location

of nodules Nodules in different parts have different malignant possibilities, for example, thyroid nodules are mostly benign, while lung nodules need to be more vigilant.

3. Comprehensive analysis

of imaging features -It should not be judged only by a single feature, but should be analyzed by combining multiple features.

Further diagnosis

Even if the benign and malignant nodules are preliminarily judged by imaging examination reports, further diagnosis is still needed:

1. Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNA)

-Histological or cytological examination of suspected malignant nodules.

2. Laboratory examination

-Blood tumor markers, genetic testing, etc.

3. Follow-up observation

-Nodules of uncertain nature may require periodic imaging follow-up to observe changes in the nodule.

Conclusion

Preliminary judgment of benign and malignant nodules through imaging examination reports requires professional knowledge and experience. The above characteristics only provide an analytical framework, and the specific conditions of patients and the professional judgment of doctors should be taken into account in practical application. For suspected malignant nodules, further examination and diagnosis should be carried out as soon as possible for timely treatment. In any case, follow the advice of a professional doctor to make sound medical decisions.