Controlling trident nerve pains, first we need to know why we’re looking all over for medical attention and eventually getting worse. What’s wrong with our understanding of disease treatment? It is important to understand these problems in order to be able to work with doctors on their own initiative to better treat tridental pain.
The following experts elaborate on some of the most common misperceptions:
The wrong idea is that if you spend your money, you’ll be cured.
It is generally believed that the trident nerve pain can be cured with the most expensive and best medicine. It’s actually the wrong idea. Although economically powerful, the regulated use of expensive drugs is a good thing for the treatment of facial spasms. However, trident nerve pains are often difficult to cure through a single drug.
At this point, often new problems arise, and there is still some risk to drug treatment and considerable damage to humans. In the end, it was painfully expensive and long, but in exchange for a rebound.
Wrong idea two, pain is cure. No pain needs cure.
The majority of patients are of middle and old age, and many of these patients cannot afford to spend money, so that they are not treated until they have suffered from pain. When the disease is managed, the pain is gradually eased or even disappears, and at this point, it is generally accepted that the absence of pain means that the disease is good. Alternatively, in order to save money, medical advice is often discontinued. These practices are so wrong!
It should be understood that if regular medical review is not followed, the condition will soon rebound. Theoretically, when the pain rises again, it gets worse and worse. At this time, the situation has often reached a more serious stage, making treatment more difficult. Even if it is controlled again, it affects the life of the patient, and the efficacy will certainly deteriorate.
Wrong view three.
On the one hand, the failure of the patient to comply fully with medical advice, on the other hand, and the failure of the doctor to provide a clear explanation, or the lack of adequate awareness and long-term planning of the treatment of the disease by the doctor himself, have led to a large number of patients losing confidence in the doctor because the treatment has been ineffective for some time.
Some patients are treated on their own by “tubes”, either by taking painkillers or by adding painkillers to the programme for long periods of time. You know, painkillers cover up the situation and give the patient a very good picture, but the situation is actually progressing. No pain, but the body is getting worse, which is very dangerous for the control of trident nerve pain.
The treatment of trident neuropsychiatric pain requires, first and foremost, a clear understanding of the disease itself and of the normative treatment of the disease, together with a very experienced doctor, the patient and the patient, in close cooperation, if the intended treatment is to be achieved.
How should trident nerve pain be treated?
At present, most general treatments for the disease are painkillers, such as Camassipin, Okassipin, Bentoin Sodium, etc., but only for short periods of time. Further treatments are for trident neurodestructive surgery, such as radio frequency, gamma knives, which has the advantage of being less traumatic in the procedure, which is applied to elderly patients who are weak and have surgical taboos, but whose disadvantages are more evident, with a sense of disappearance and numbness occurring first on the side of the nerve after the destruction of the trident, and, in the second case, with a generally higher rate of relapse, which makes the patient feel more painful in the event of repeated pain.
Most of the initial trident neuropsychiatric pains occur as a result of the close vascular effects on the inner part of the nerve of the trident, and, in response to the causes of the disease, trident neuro-microvascular repressures have started. The effects have been good, and the post-occupy patients still feel normal, with a five-year relapse rate significantly lower than other treatments, because of the absence of damage to the trident nerve. Even if the post-operative re-emergence occurred, it was due to the fall of the mats separated from the responsible vessels or to the emergence of a new one, and the re-operative operation was still in effect, so microvascular decompression was recognized as the best treatment for the present cranial neurosis, such as trident neurological pain and abrasive convulsions and larvae.
Microvascular repressure treatment for trident nerve pain applies to the population:
The MRI shows that patients with significant vascular oppression, well-healthed young and middle-aged patients, and patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, are not fit for this procedure.
The treatment features: Dr. Wang Zheng, neurosurgery, Tangdu Hospital, described the microvascular repressure treatment of trident neuropsychiatric pains, without neurological damage, and the absence of signs of decomposition such as numbing at the back of the surgery, although the operation required a skull-opening operation, complex processes, high technical difficulties, high risk, and re-emergence of treatment, and recommended that a formal medical facility be selected for surgery.
