Guidelines for the preventive use of antibiotics in digestive endoscopy
In the field of internal digestive medicine, the digestive endoscopy plays an essential role, covering a wide range of types, such as stomach mirrors, colonoscopys, mesmoscopes, ultrasound endoscopys, etc., and provides a visual window for the accurate diagnosis and effective treatment of diseases in the digestive system. However, with the increasing frequency and complexity of operations, the risk of operational-related infections is becoming high, and the preventive use of antibiotics is an important risk management and patient safety initiative. However, clear and authoritative guidance is urgently needed as to when, what and how to use it, and the Guidelines for the Preventive Use of Antibiotics in Indigent Mirrors should be produced with a view to building the scientific foundation for clinical practice.
I. Indigestion internal mirror operation risk profile
Indigestion endoscopy and treatment are intrusive operations, and equipment travels through the body’s natural cavity, inevitably touching and breaking the mucous membranes barrier, creating a “window of opportunity” for pathogens such as bacteria. The stomach mirrors are found in the oesophagus, gastrophagus, mediocre, cystalcosis, etc., and a large number of oral enzymes (e.g. streptococcus, anaerobicella) may be contaminated with digestive mucous membranes and “drink” in the facade; they operate in the intestinal tract “preciplasming” in which the intestinal intestinal tract is burgeoned, colicoccus, cobopella, cobopella, etc., increases the risk of bacterial transfer if the intestinal wall is affected by infirmary health, carcinoma is removed, carcinitis is removed; and, like ERCP, which involves a complex inner-scopy technique involving cholesterolism, incousinosis and incinosis, the effects of which are more likely to result in intestinal bacteria and intestinal bacteria.
Core principles for the preventive use of antibiotics
1. Strict possession of adaptive evidence: Clinical decision-making is by no means arbitrary and must be based on sufficient evidence. It is defined as a high-risk operation, such as a lack of choreography in ERCP, a lack of choreography such as cholesterol blockage, a narrow cholesterol, a bacterium prone to cholesterol siltation, pre-emptive antibiotic resistance, post-cocrylitis, circulatory ligation or scortifier injection, mucous membrane fracture, partial blood movement, and, in order to prevent infection, appropriate medication, as well as a sub-corruptal repair, which exposes the mouth to bacteria-rich digestive tracts. On the other hand, general gastrointestinal lenses, non-traumatic colonoscopy screening, without a special high-risk factor for infection, do not recommend preventive use and avoid the abuse of resistance. Precision choice of drug appliance operation type: The method involves the “scaling and tailoring” of a common pathogen spectra. Insulin operations, which, given the predominance of intestinal bacteria invertebrate infections, are the preferred antibacterial drugs to cover gelatin cacteria (e.g., coli-Ecstasy, Creberella) and intestinal fungi, which are often preferred by the precipitine quartone schubathan, aminosicillin schubathan, oesophagus and clinicin, which are effective against oral strepella, fungus, fungus, etc., and intestinal section operations, which take into account intestinal anoroxin “power”, nitromic acetate (e.g., capisolium, nitrazon) and intestinal fungi, in concert with the complex to build “coerence”. Time and course of treatment for controlled drugs: time like “warplanes”, early drug use to increase drug resistance, adverse reactions and late failure to respond to infections. In most cases, 30 – 60 minutes before the operation of IVA antibiotics to ensure an effective “peak” level of the drug in the body during the operation, e.g., pre-ERCP giving the headactone schubathan drops and the drug “waiting” against bacteria with the blood cycle. The treatment follows a “short and flat” approach, a stop drug for preventive purposes, followed by a routine operation of 1-2 days, to avoid a long period of hysteria that disrupts the micro-ecosystems of the body and causes “secondary disasters” such as hard-to-reach infections.
III. Special case responses
Groups of people with immuno-deficiency: AIDS, chronic immunosuppressants, chemotherapy to immunize the under-immunosuppressors, physical defence for “fortress” is fragile, and endoscopy operations need to be carefully assessed at even low risk. In addition to strict adherence to the conventional principle, the choice of a drug to enhance the breadth and strength of the antibacterial spectrum, consideration could be given to the addition of vanacin for the drug-resistant fungus fungus, Lifoping aid for the anti-tuberculosis bacterium (when the nodules are exhausted and digestive tracts) and the extension of the post-operative observation period and the review of the infection indicators, as required, in order to detect the infection “fibre” in a timely manner. 2. Cardiac valve disease and artificial joint replacements: In accordance with the guidelines, if there are high-risk factors of infection (e.g., dental choreography, poor intestinal preparation), the prevention of intrauterine inflammation, coronal infections for anti-bacterial haemorrhagic disorders, pre-operative preventive use of antibiotics is regulated by the heart, osteoporosis programme, more than the head gills, potassium amosilin Kravite, etc., the risk of haemorrhage is weighed against the risk of infection and the risk of infection, and the patient ‘ s long-term implanting function is guaranteed stability and life health.
Monitoring, assessment and quality control
The whole course of the drug is closely monitored to observe the evolution of infection indicators such as the patient ‘ s temperature, blood patterns and C reaction protein, to combine clinical symptoms (breath pain, fever, yellow sluice, etc.), to detect if the infection occurs and to assess the effectiveness of antibiotics. At the level of departments and medical institutions, the quality control loops are constructed, the cases of preventive drugs are regularly retrospectively analysed, data on the rationality of drug use and the incidence of infection are collected, in-house training, case discussions are conducted, lessons learned are learned, rules are applied to optimize the guidelines, based on new evidence-based medical evidence and the drug resistance situation, to make the ingestion lens treatments more secure and efficient under the reasonably “guarded” of antibiotics.
Concluding remarks
The Guidelines for the Preventive Use of Antibiotics in Indigestion Insulation Mirrors correspond to a precise navigational chart, balancing the infection prevention and the rational use of the drug scales in a wave of microindigestion lenses. Clinical health-care staff follow the guidelines, using professional judgement and human care as the basis for writing a “safe chapter” for the treatment of digestive diseases, which is accompanied by further research and experience, continuing to study the rules of the guidelines, providing an inexhaustible impetus to the patient’s health and well-being, and building a solid barrier against infection in the “square inches” of digestive endoscopy operations.
Diseases of the digestive system, not specifically.
