The re-emergence is periodically reviewed after the re-emergence of the membrane, as some patients are partially excised by the surgery, leaving a part of the brain remaining, and later the re-emergence. This situation is reviewed more frequently, depending on the circumstances of the case, the frequency and spacing of the review should be determined on a case-by-case basis, and the occurrence of symptoms of clinical discomfort or aggravated symptoms should be reviewed in a timely manner. The review resulted in the prompt detection of problems and prompt treatment.
Moreover, to see whether there has been a recurrence of meningitis, most patients do not have a re-emergence after a thorough surgery, but there are still individual cases of re-emergence of meningitis, usually in the original part. In the first year of general surgery, one or two reviews are carried out, and in the absence of clinical symptoms and visual anomalies, the number of reviews is gradually decreasing. In the event of a recurrence, a second surgical removal is possible if the patient ‘ s physical condition permits.
Post-menopausal review of meningococcal cancer
1. Why should a patient be re-examined after a cerebral tumour only to see if the tumor has re-emerged?
Post-menopausal patients review mainly for re-embracing brain tumors, and partly because of changes in human functioning and organs following brain surgery, such as high pre-menopausal blood sugar, infertility, heart failure, fracture, endocrine disorders, high blood pressure and recovery from the operation. Is there a need for blood sugar and blood pressure treatment? Is infertility related to other diseases? A range of issues, such as the need for hormonal substitution treatment for endocrine disorders, need to be addressed after review. Some of the problems are easier to resolve, but some patients do not pay attention to the review, delaying access to treatment.
Strictly speaking, the re-emergence of a meningitis is not defined as the re-emergence of a meningitis, which means that the brain tumor has been completely removed by the operation, and the subsequent growth of the same brain tumor within the skull; The latter means that the brain tumor is partially removed from the operation, that it remains part of the skull, and that it is later re-emerged. This situation is reviewed more frequently than the former, depending on the circumstances of the case, the frequency and spacing of the review depending on the circumstances, and the occurrence of symptoms of clinical discomfort or the aggravation of the original symptoms should be reviewed in a timely manner. The review resulted in the prompt detection of problems and prompt treatment.
2. How often does the review of meningitis take place?
The review of the meningitis is generally the first review of the meningitis three months after the first operation, one year later and every six months during the second year. By the third year of the year, the number of reviews can be reduced if there is no abnormality in brain imaging, and if the symptoms of discomfort are diagnosed well in advance.
3. Do you need to bring all the video material for review?
Upon review, a comprehensive assessment of the evolving condition of your condition is carried out, with the surgical information, with the images of the previous review, in full, in order to facilitate comparison between doctors and better judgement of changes in the condition.
4. What should be reviewed after a brain tumor?
There is still a need for periodic review after the brain tumour, and routine examinations such as CT, MRI, etc., are carried out to study diseases through brain morphological abnormalities and to detect the recovery of the stove, whether or not there has been a relapse, which is the most common brain tumour screening programme in hospitals. However, these checks have some limitations on the ability of the post-operative scar tissue to identify a recurrence. The PET-CT inspection is a combination of PET and CT technology, which, in addition to morphological anomalies, can be analysed from a metabolic point of view, and the re-emergence of post-operative tectonic tissues has the advantage of compensating for the shortcomings of the CT routine.
