In the pursuit of health and in the fight against bacteria, antibacterials become powerful helpers. At the moment, many believe that natural antibacterials are more comprehensive than synthetic antibacterials, as if gifts from nature were perfect, but not so.
Natural antibacterials are widely taken from plants, animals, minerals, etc. Like tea-tree oil, extracted from tea leaves, with special odours, which inhibit the growth of bacteria such as coli and golden grapes, which are often applied to skin-care products; and shelled sugar, which originates in crustaceans such as shrimp and crabs, which can hinder the formation of bacterial cystals, with their headbrushes in food conservation and medicine. They give people a mild, almighty illusion through “natural” labels.
Synthetic antibacterial agents are prepared through chemical processes such as common alcohol, chlorinators, trichlorfon, etc. Alcohol degenerates bacterial proteins, rapidly decontaminating the fungi, which is a “star product” of daily disinfection; chlorine-containing disinfectants destroy bacterial structures by means of greater oxidation, and are widely used in public places such as swimming pools, hospitals, etc., with significant effects. These synthetic antibacterial agents work quickly in a given scenario.
However, natural antibacterial agents are not more comprehensive. On the one hand, the antibacterial spectrum of natural antibacterial agents is usually narrower. Most of them can only be used for a limited number of pathogens, such as bee glue extracts, which, while inhibiting some of the intestines in the mouth, appear impotent in the face of intestinal intestines, such as hard-to-feed. Anti-synthetic antibacterial agents, such as broad spectrum antibiotics, can be effective at the same time for a variety of bacterial infections and are life-saving in the treatment of complex whole-body bacterial infections.
On the other hand, natural antibacterials are not stable. It is highly influenced by environmental factors such as light, temperature and humidity, as in the case of lavender oils, with long periods of light oxidized, anti-bacterial activity falling in straight lines and short shelf life. Synthetic antibacterial agents are well-defined and structurally stable and can sustain antibacterial efficacy for long periods of time if stored properly. Synthetic antibacterials have a significant advantage in areas where the need for stability is very high, such as pharmaceuticals and medical disinfection.
Furthermore, the extraction and purification of natural antibacterial agents is complex and costly. This limits their large-scale application, with some rare plants extracting antibacterial ingredients that are expensive and can only be used in small quantities for high-end skin protection. Synthetic antibacterials are industrially mature and low-cost and can be produced in large quantities to meet the daily and frequent needs for disinfection in public places such as hospitals, schools, factories, etc.
In practice, excessive superstition of natural anti-bacterial agents can delay the situation and bury the risk. The child ‘ s skin is slightly bruised and parents may become inflammated if they use only natural plant antibacterial ointment, which is less effective and less effective. Food-processing enterprises that use only natural preservation antibacterials are faced with complex microbiological contamination that makes it difficult to ensure food safety and can cause food-borne diseases.
Of course, this is not a denial of the value of natural antibacterial agents, whose mild, low-toxic properties are appropriate for daily care and maintenance. Skin-sensitive people can reduce irritation by choosing skin protections with natural components. The right approach is one of rational choice based on demand, daily cleaning, care, and natural antibacterials, which are good choices; more reliable in dealing with high-risk bacterial infections, widespread disinfection and synthetic antibacterials.
Natural antibacterials and synthetic antibacterials each have advantages and disadvantages, and no one is more comprehensive than who. It is only by moving out of the wrong zone and choosing on the basis of scenes and needs that antibacterial agents can be protected for healthy lives, rather than misled by one-sided perceptions.
