Abstract: This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the rumours that “revenging fluids is fast after infection, so they are required for any disease”. By describing the application of the infusion, analysing its potential risks, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of different treatments and emphasizing the importance of rational use, the false nature of the rumour leads the public to the correct perception of treatment.
First, in everyday life, many people who are infected with a disease consider that the best and fastest treatment is to be administered, regardless of the severity of the condition. This perception reflects, in part, public misperceptions about the treatment of diseases and overreliance on infusion. In fact, the infusion does not apply to all diseases and there is a certain risk. The rumour will be refuted in this paper in order to help the public understand the role of IVS in the treatment of infectious diseases.
II. APPLICATION OF TRANSFER
(i) For serious bacterial infections, such as sepsis, pneumonia, etc., when oral drugs are difficult to control, the infusion can quickly transfer the drug into the body to an effective therapeutic concentration and thus control the infection.
(ii) Dehydration and electrolyte disorders. In cases of severe diarrhoea, vomiting, etc., the patient may experience dehydration and electrolyte disorders, where the infusion can supplement moisture and electrolyte and maintain normal metabolic functions of the body.
(iii) Injection is a necessary treatment for patients who are unable to take an oral drug, such as unconsciousness, severe vomiting and difficulty in swallowing.
III. Potential risks from the infusion
(i) Allergies. During the infusion, the patient may have allergies such as rashes, itching, breathing difficulties, etc. Serious allergies can endanger life.
(ii) Injection response. The response includes heat, cold warfare, nausea, vomiting, etc., caused by contamination during the infusion process, inappropriate drug preparation, etc.
(iii) Risk of infection. The infusion requires piercing, which increases the risk of infection, such as local infections, intravenous diseases, etc. If the operation is not regulated or disinfected, it can also lead to whole-body infections.
(iv) The drug enters the blood cycle directly when it is injected with an adverse reaction that is likely to occur and to be more severe than the oral drug. For example, some drugs can cause severe adverse effects such as heart disorders and low blood pressure.
IV. Comparison of different treatments
(i) Oral drugs are the most common form of treatment, with advantages of convenience, safety and economy. Oral drugs, which have gradually been absorbed through the gastrointestinal tract, have worked relatively slowly, but are an effective treatment for most mild infections and chronic diseases.
(ii) Muscular injection. Muscular injections apply to drugs that are not suitable for oral use or that require rapid performance. Injection of muscles absorbs drugs faster than oral drugs, but slower than infusion. The risk of muscle injection is relatively low, but may also cause adverse effects such as local pain, red and red.
(iii) Exogenous drugs are an effective treatment for some endemic diseases such as skin and eye infections. External drugs have a direct effect on the pathology, reducing the risk of a systemic adverse reaction.
V. Importance of rational use
(i) In the treatment of an infected disease, the appropriate treatment shall be chosen on the basis of such factors as the severity of the disease and the individual circumstances of the patient. For minor infections, oral or external drugs may be a better option; for patients with severe infections or who cannot take oral drugs, a transfusion may be necessary.
(ii) Avoiding over-treatment. Over-treatment not only increases the financial burden on patients, but may also pose unnecessary risks. In the course of treatment, the principle of “oral non-injecting, muscular non-injection” should be followed to avoid unnecessary infusion.
(iii) Increased drug dependence. Patients should take drugs in strict compliance with the doctor ‘ s recommendations and take them on time and on a scale that avoids self-inflicted reduction or withdrawal. Increased drug dependence can improve treatment effectiveness and reduce the recurrence of disease.
Measures to correct misconceptions
(i) To strengthen health education by making available to the public, through various channels, such as the media, medical institutions, schools, etc., information on the treatment of infectious diseases, to correct the misconception that “transmitting is good and good” and to improve public health.
(ii) To regulate medical behaviour. Medical institutions should strengthen the training and management of doctors, regulate medical behaviour and avoid excessive infusion. Based on the patient ‘ s medical condition and treatment needs, the doctor should reasonably choose the treatment to provide the patient with a safe and effective treatment.
(iii) Strengthening of supervision. The health administration should strengthen its supervision of medical institutions, strictly control the use of infusion fluids and punish irregularities. At the same time, regulation of the quality of medicines should be strengthened to ensure the safety of fluids.
The conclusion is that “infection of a disease leads to the rapid improvement of the fluid so that whatever the disease requires it” is a misconception. Injection, while necessary in some cases, does not apply to all diseases and poses a certain risk. In the treatment of infected diseases, the appropriate treatment should be chosen in accordance with the situation, in accordance with the principle of reasonable use of medication and in order to avoid overtreatment. At the same time, the strengthening of health education, the regulation of medical behaviour and the strengthening of regulations have helped to correct public misconceptions, improve the quality of care and ensure the safety of patients.
