Common anti-infection error zones: cognitive, impact and coping strategies

Summary: The purpose of this paper is to explore common areas of anti-infection error, analyse their causes, impacts and propose appropriate responses. Promote the rational use of anti-infection drugs, improve the effectiveness and safety of anti-infection treatment and reduce the generation of resistance by raising public and medical awareness of these areas.

Anti-infection treatment is important in the medical field, but there are many errors in clinical practice and public awareness. These areas of error can lead to failures in anti-infection treatment, delays in medical conditions, increased adverse reactions and the generation of drug-resistant bacteria, which pose a serious threat to personal and public health. The in-depth analysis of common anti-infection error zones is therefore of great relevance.

II. Common anti-infection error zones

(i) Mistake One: the random use of antibiotics. Many people use antibiotics on their own during infectious diseases such as flu and flu. In fact, antibiotics are ineffective against viral infections, such as common colds caused mainly by nose viruses, and the use of antibiotics not only does not alleviate symptoms, but may also disrupt the normal population balance in the human body, causing adverse reactions such as diarrhoea, fungi infections and increasing the risk of bacterial resistance.

(ii) Erection II: Symptoms abated, i.e., detoxification. At this point, however, the pathogen in the body may not have been completely removed and could easily lead to re-emergence or conversion to chronic infections. For example, if urology system infections are not adequately treated, the remaining bacteria may cause inflammation again and subsequent treatment may be more difficult.

(iii) Misdemeanor III: The pursuit of high-level antibiotics. Some patients believe that the newer, the better, the better, the better, the higher-level antibiotics are required. However, different antibiotics have their specific antibacterial spectrometry, which should be reasonably selected according to the pathogen type and the results of the drug-sensitive tests. Abuse of high-level antibiotics accelerates the development of bacterial resistance and exposes future treatments for infections to drug-free dilemmas.

(iv) Mistake four: Neglect of infection prevention tends to focus on post-infection treatment, while ignoring the importance of infection prevention. For example, lack of attention to hygiene in hospital settings, non-compliance with isolation measures, etc., can lead to cross-infection. In community life, there is a lack of vaccination awareness, such as low vaccination rates for influenza, pneumonia, etc., which increases the risk of contracting the corresponding pathogens.

III. Reasons for errors

(i) Lack of public medical knowledge The general public ‘ s lack of in-depth understanding of the mechanisms, scope of application, etc. to counter the drug infection and its vulnerability to misleading advertising, other people ‘ s experiences, etc., resulting in false perceptions of the use of the drug.

(ii) Medical personnel factors. Some medical personnel have inadequate operational levels or have irregular use of drugs to meet unreasonable patient requirements. At the same time, the failure to adequately explain the norms and importance of anti-infection treatment to patients in their communication also leads to misunderstanding.

(iii) The market for medicines is tumultuous. Some drug advertisements exaggerate the efficacy of antibiotics and mislead consumers. In addition, the irregular sale of antibiotics in some pharmacies, without prescription, has made it too easy for the public to obtain antibiotics and has contributed to an irrational use of medicines.

IV. THE IMPACT OF THE ASSESSMENT

(i) Improper anti-infection treatment that has an impact on the health of the individual can lead to treatment failure, increased illness, extended pathology and increased suffering and financial burden. The long-term or inappropriate use of antibiotics can also cause adverse drug responses, damaging vital organ functions such as liver and kidney functions and hearing.

(ii) The impact on public health The widespread abuse of antibiotics accelerates the spread of bacterial resistance and increases the incidence of drug-resistant infections. The difficulty and high mortality rates of treatment for drug-resistant infections pose a major challenge to global public health and consumes significant medical resources.

Response

(i) Strengthen public education through a variety of channels, such as science outreach, community lectures, school education, etc., in order to increase public awareness of the rational use of antibiotics and to increase self-health and infection prevention awareness.

(ii) To improve the professional literacy of medical personnel and to strengthen the training of medical personnel in the norms of anti-infection treatment and to conduct periodic examinations to ensure that they have accurate knowledge of the principles and methods of use of anti-infection drugs. At the same time, the training of patients and patients in communication skills has been strengthened to enable medical personnel to effectively convey the correct treatment messages to patients.

(iii) To regulate the pharmaceutical market, to strengthen the regulation of drug advertising and to combat false propaganda. The prescription regime for antibiotics is strictly enforced, the practices of pharmacies are regulated and the irrational use of antibiotics is controlled from the source.

Conclusions

Common anti-infection error zones seriously affect the effectiveness and safety of anti-infection treatment and pose multiple threats to personal and public health. A combination of measures to improve public education, improve the professionalism of medical personnel and regulate the pharmaceutical market is expected to correct these errors, promote rational and regulated treatment against infection and protect human health and public health.