Criteria for the diagnosis of direct spinal disease

Diagnosis of high-relative spinal disease is a comprehensive assessment process, and the following is sequenced according to relative importance: It is able to show clearly, at an early stage of the disease, the inflammatory pathologies of osteoporosis, filamentitis and mystic arthritis, even when the patient has not shown visible clinical symptoms or X-rays, and CT has not shown typical pathologies. This ability to detect pathologies at an early stage is essential for timely intervention and for improving patient prognosis. The CT examination of the thallium joint (updated by MRI for more precise observation of bone changes) is clearer than the X-line in showing the thorium joint pathologies. It can detect nuanced osteoporosis at an earlier stage, e.g., cortex erosion, hardening, etc. Following MRI ‘ s discovery of an inflammatory pathologie, CT examinations can further assess the extent of bone damage, and the auxiliary physician will more accurately determine the condition. 3. X-ray examinations (post-image changes to observe the progress of the disease), although less sensitive to early diagnosis than MRI and CT, have important value in observing the long-term progress and late performance of the disease. As the condition evolves, the X-ray can see the blurry edge of the hip, the bone damage, the change of the joints between the joints, and the change of the small joints between the spinal vertebrates, such as the late spinal lumber stasis. These characteristics are an important basis for judging the extent and progress of the disease. 1. Back pain (typical and common core symptoms), which is the most representative of the most direct spinal disease, is usually found at the hips or hips and can spread up the spine. Its pain characteristics, which are hidden, in particular the “morning freeze” in early morning, which lasts more than 30 minutes, absconds after activity and increases after rest, may have a key pointing effect in indicating a strong straight spinal column. 2. Symptoms of external ecstasy (symptoms that assist in the assessment of the extent of the disease), pain, swelling and restriction of activities such as hips, knees, ankles, etc., in some cases of patients, although not in every patient, may, when these symptoms are present, assist the physician to determine the severity and extent of the disease and to further support the diagnosis of a strong straight spine. 1. The HLA – B27 test (which is important as a hint but not a basis for diagnosis), HLA – B27 is closely related to a strong straight spinal column, positive results are indicative of the diagnosis, and HLA – B27 positive can increase the credibility of a strong direct spinal column diagnosis when the patient has relevant clinical symptoms and visual manifestations. However, as there is also a certain percentage of HLA-B27 positives in the general population, it cannot be used as a separate basis for diagnosis. Inflammatory indicators (references for assessing the extent of activity), blood sedation (ESR) and C reaction protein (CRP) are commonly used indicators that reflect the extent of inflammation in the body. They are used primarily to assess the activity of the case of direct spinal disease, to monitor the effects of treatment and to determine whether or not the disease is re-emerging. While an increase in inflammation indicators may support an active diagnosis of the disease, there may also be an increase in other inflammatory diseases, so that the diagnosis acts as a complement to the diagnosis of the disease, which is somewhat less important than the earlier visual and clinical symptoms.