In a wave of pursuit of healthy life, antibacterial products have entered our horizons, handwashing, bathing, cleaning agents have been labeled with antibacterial labels, and many people are beginning to develop the illusion that the antibacterial mechanisms of the human body appear to be being replaced by these antibacterial products, and from that time on, there is no fear. However, this is a complete error, and we are looking at it today.
The human body’s own anti-bacterial mechanism is like a fine and solid fortress. The skin, as the largest organ of the human body, is the first to flush the barrier. Its angular layer consists of closely arranged dead cells, like a tenacious “wall” that can prevent the vast majority of bacteria from entering; the fat of the piping gland and the addition of a “protective membrane” to the skin cover, which makes it difficult for the fungus to bind. Once the fungi breaks through the skin line, the immune system in the body is “alarming” and immune cells such as white cells and porcelain cells, like heroic “soldiers”, travel to the battlefield to identify, devour and destroy the fungi; at the same time, the antibodies in the blood are also active in “fighting” and are finely integrated into the fungi, rendering them dead. Furthermore, the mucous membrane of the human respiratory tract moves through the fiery hair, excreting the sap and the fungus together, and guarding the vital respiratory tract.
Anti-bacterial products, which do have something in everyday life. For example, antibacterial hand-washing fluids can be effective in removing common pathogenic microorganisms such as coli and yellow grapes contaminated with hands, and can be used in a timely manner after exposure to public goods, reducing the risk of hand-borne disease; antibacterial cleaners are used for home cleaning, inhibiting the growth of objects ‘ surface bacteria and creating a relatively clean living environment. But this in no way means they can replace the antibacterial mechanisms of the human body itself.
First, antibacterial products are of limited scope and external support. They can only function on the surface of the body or object and cannot penetrate into the “operational zones” of the complex immune system within the human body. The human body is faced with a “stealing attack” of bacteria, whether floating in the air or harmful bacteria in food, which, when they enter the body through the first line of defence, can only be dealt with in a comprehensive manner by their own immune system, at a time when antibacterial products are too long.
Second, overdependence on antibacterial products weakens humans ‘ own antibacterial capacity. The human immune system needs to be properly “exercised”, and the fungus is natural “spare practice”. The long-term and extensive use of anti-bacterial products has resulted in a sharp decline in exposure to bacteria, and the immune system, like being “inactivity”, has gradually deteriorated in its ability to identify and respond to bacteria. For example, children are chronically over-resistant, and once placed in complex external environments, such as kindergartens and parks, they are highly vulnerable to disease because of the loss of the body’s “frontline” to fight the disease autonomously.
Furthermore, the improper use of antibacterial products can also disrupt the micro-ecological balance of humans. There are a large number of beneficial micro-organisms in the body surface and body, skin surface strains helping to maintain skin health and intestinal intestines helping to digest and regulate immunization. Some powerful anti-bacterial products are highly susceptible to “micro-injury” and benefit, breaking micro-ecological balance and causing skin allergies and intestinal disorders.
It takes a two-pronged approach to protect health. On the one hand, the rational use of antibacterial products and, on the other hand, the use of suitable antibacterial products, such as antibacterial shampoo by medical personnel who are in frequent contact with patients, as well as the use of antibacterial cleaning and cleaning equipment in the kitchen after the processing of raw foods, are on demand in critical areas where the disease is easily transmitted, such as hospitals, kitchens and toilets. On the other hand, greater emphasis should be placed on strengthening the human body’s own anti-bacterial line, maintaining a healthy lifestyle, balancing the diet to provide the necessary nutrition for the immune system, regularizing the rest of the body, promoting the blood cycle and immunocellular activity, and keeping the antibacterial mechanism of the human body “at best combat”.
The antibacterial mechanism of the human body itself is a “godic instrument” that has evolved over time and is never to be replaced by antibacterial products. Only if they are mutually reinforcing will we be able to maintain a healthy position in the world where the disease lives.
