In a private letter the other day, a mother said that her baby had an vascular tumor and that, after her visit to the hospital, the doctor said that the child was an vascular malformation and that the effects of the medication were not particularly evident, but that treatment could be done by means of incipient hardening.
What kept her from thinking was that, after the surgery, the doctor had said that it was interventional embolism.
Since she had previously consulted online and was aware that the interventional treatment of angioma was in the form of sclerosis and embolism, she was particularly angry now because both she and her family were concerned about the risk of disemboweling and other places with blood vessels.
Actually, there’s nothing to worry about.
Because of the embolism used to treat vascular tumours by catheteric artery, which is commonly referred to as interventional embolism, there are three broad categories:
1. Self-condensation or tissue.
2. Drug embolisms such as water-free ethanol, polyethylene alcohol, etc.
3. Embolisms, such as amplified sponges, springs, etc.
In combination with the case of the sick child, the general rate is that of embolism, which is due to the fact that the doctor found in the procedure a high blood flow rate in the child ‘ s condition, and that the effect of simple sclerosis treatment is not particularly evident, and therefore the interventional treatment programme was introduced.
However, in the course of their surgery, doctors are able to scrutinise the lower veins of the disease, because a simple embolism can lead to the emergence of a side cycle leading to the failure of the treatment, a process that can be simply understood as a “bong” and which is why there is little chance that the embolism will fall and enter the blood cycle.
Angioplasm.
