Mistake of antibacterials.
Antibacterial drugs are a large and diverse type of drug with a wide range of clinical applications that play an important role in the control of infectious diseases that endanger human health and heal and save the lives of countless patients. There are many patients who use antibacterials as “one-size-fits-all drugs” and think of them as “all-embracing; they treat antibacterials at random, if they want to eat, if they want to stop; and they feel that the price is better and better. The abuse of antibiotics, leading to the spread and spread of bacterial resistance, will lead to a serious situation of lack of medical treatment for multiple drug-resistant infections. Without exception, these are misconceptions about antibacterial drugs. So, what are the common antibacterial drugs being used wrongly? Now, let’s just talk.
I. What’s an antibacterial?
Antibacterial drugs are all kinds of antibiotics and chemically synthetic drugs that are fungicide or antibacterial activity, mainly for whole-body application (some of which can also be used in part), in which antibiotics are semi-synthetic derivatives of microbiological products and antibiotics that kill or inhibit certain microorganisms. Among them are antibiotics and synthetic drugs, which are common for a dozen types of drugs, such as beta-nimamine, aminomal sugar slurry, large cyclopentone, phenolone, licorin, septide, tetracyclic, chlorocin, sulfamide and nitroazole. The antibacterial spectrometry of each drug type, as well as the absorption, distribution, metabolic and excretion processes in the body, vary even among different types of the same drug. It should be noted that, while antibacterial drugs are a regular drug in many small family kits, they are prescription drugs that need to be used under the guidance of a doctor or pharmacist.
II. Misuse of antibacterial drugs
Wrong 1: Antibacterial is antiinflammatory.
Antibacterials are not equivalent to anti-inflammatory drugs. Inflammation can be medically classified as infectious and non-infective: Inflammatory inflammation is the result of inflammation caused by microbial (mostly bacteria) infections requiring treatment with antibacterial drugs, and non-inflammatory inflammation caused by non-infective factors such as antigen irritation, non-infective trauma, self-immunisation, etc., such as haematosis or rheumatological arthritis that occurs after a joint sprain, which requires treatment with asphyxiating painkillers such as aspirin and Broven. Distinguishing the type of inflammation required to select the drug.
Mistake 2: Antibacterials are all-powerful.
Patients often suffer from headaches, throat pains, snots, sores, low fever, or diarrhoea, stomach pains, and are exposed to antibiotics such as Amosicillin or crochets. Thinks antibacterials are all-powerful, including treatment. Do you need antibacterials for cold, diarrhoea, fever? Not really! (i) Cold: Many people want antibacterials to eat as soon as they find out they have cold symptoms; the flu is a common upper respiratory infection, mostly caused by nasal, para-influenza and coronary viruses. Most colds are self-restricted, no special effects. Treatment with antibacterial drugs is generally not required. The majority of patients recover by drinking more water, resting more and eating less well, and using a pair of drugs. Antibacterial drugs are for bacterial and fungi infections and are not effective for viral infections. Only if the patient continues to have a respiratory bacterial infection due to the cold, there’s a clear cough. It is only in case of osteoporosis that appropriate antibacterial drugs are selected by a specialist. The abuse of antibacterial drugs, however, is not only easily induced to produce resistant bacteria, but also has many side effects, such as indigestion, which require a doctor to determine the need for antibacterial drugs based on the patient ‘ s condition.
(2) Diarrhoea: Diarrhoea can be classified as diarrhea from infection and from non-infection. Among them, the abdominal diarrhea due to bacterial infections, which may be associated with heat, water ladders and so forth, makes it necessary to treat with anti-free drugs. However, for non-infective diarrhoea, treatment with antibacterial drugs is not required.
(3) Heat: Heat is common in life, and many people take some antibacterials as soon as they heat, which is considered to be better. In fact, the fever is not necessarily infected with pathogens, so it is not necessary to use antibacterial drugs for treatment. Antibacterial drugs should indeed be used if the fever is caused by bacterial infections; however, treatment with antibacterial drugs is ineffective if the fever is caused by viral infections or if it is non-infective (e.g. tumours, conjunctive tissue diseases, blood system diseases and endocrine diseases).
Mistake 3: Changing the drug won’t affect the cure.
The use of antibacterial drugs for the treatment of infections requires a course of treatment and half-life of the drug, so the use of antibacterial drugs requires attention to the dose, frequency and course of treatment, which cannot be changed at will. Unauthorized changes in the use of medicines by doctors may not only reduce the efficacy of the drug, but may also increase the side effects of the drug and lead to drug resistance by the bacteria. Some patients stopped the medication immediately when they realized that the symptoms were good, believing that it would have adverse effects on the body; however, anti-bacterial drug treatment of the infection had some course of treatment and it was essential to take the medication. The antibacterial efficacy of antibacterial drugs is mainly related to the duration of the drug concentrations, and when the infection is beginning to improve, the fungi in the human body is not completely eliminated, “the wildfire is burning and the spring wind is blowing back”, and if a premature stoppage results in repeated infections and aggravated symptoms.
Mistake 4: Antibacterial drugs are as expensive as possible.
The newer the antibacterial, the higher the cost, the better? Not really! In practice, the choice of anti-bacterial drugs is linked to a variety of factors, including the location of the infection, the place where the infection occurs and the patient ‘ s own basic situation. In addition, the sensitive strains of different antibacterial drugs vary, as do the distribution in the body. It is therefore necessary to speculate on possible pathogens in the context of the above-mentioned factors, and to combine such factors as the effects of the drug itself. Treating insensitive bacteria with so-called new or expensive drugs is like shooting arrows off targets, meaningless and wasteful of money. At the same time, high-level drug abuse can easily induce bacterial resistance, leading to a final antibacterial line failure and ultimately to drug availability.
In short, the elimination of the faulty use of antibacterial drugs and the rational use of antibacterial drugs make it possible to “do away with them” and to be responsible for their own health.
