Patients with tumours have skin piercing: risks and suspicions are known.
I. OVERVIEW OF PURPOSE
Leather piercing is clinically more common as a tumour diagnostic method. Among them, pulmonary punctures are mainly applied through pulmonary punctures and under bronchial lenses. Skin pulmonary punctures are examined by means of cross-breeding through the chest wall to the patient ‘ s stove, guided by videotography such as X-line, CT, B, which is applied to the swollen mass and other stoves around the lungs, with the potential for haemorrhage. The pulmonary puncture under the bronchial mirror is the central type of disease that is present in the pulmonary door of the pneumatic stove, which, guided by an ultrasound, reaches the porcelain needle and is sampled and examined.
Hepatic piercing is guided by video-image, with a stinging on suspicious liver pathologies. In general, this is due to the colour superstition and CT, especially the reinforcement of the CT, when indicating that the patient is a hepatopathic disease or the possibility of tumours. Hepatopathological examinations are carried out through an empty needle, which is inserted into the liver with ultrasound guidance, to extract a portion of the liver tissue suspected of the disease, which is often used to diagnose other liver diseases such as cirrhosis of the liver, liver tumours, etc.
Skin piercing is increasingly used in clinical applications, especially in cases where the diagnosis cannot be clearly diagnosed by stinging off cytology and fibre bronchoscopy, which is an easy and rapid diagnostic and diagnostic method. The first pulmonary puncture biopsy started under a visual fluorescent screen, now under CT or B super-directed, with over 90% diagnosis and less than 2% complications.
II. Exploring the risk of perforation
(i) Common complications
1. Air chest
The pulmonary chest is one of the most common complications, with incidences ranging from 2 to 30 per cent. The incidence of pneumatic chests is related to the distance from the chest wall of the pedestals, the greater the distance, the higher the incidence. Small amounts of the aerobic chest are self-absorbed, and patients generally have no symptoms of manifest discomfort. If there are large amounts of pneumatic chest, it is necessary to move immediately to the chest cavity.
Blood breast
Blood chests mostly have a small hemorrhage and do not normally require special treatment. If the haemorrhage is large and the patient undergoes changes in vital signs, such as respiratory difficulties, reduced blood pressure, rate of increase, etc., hemorrhaging, supplementary blood capacity, thoracic cavity intubation, etc., shall be treated and, if necessary, operated to stop the bleeding. The approach is mainly to perform early and timely thoracic piercings in closed flow, while taking care of wound care and regularly replacing dressing. In the case of a sharp puncture that causes a blood chest, the sharp instrument should be removed, the wound should be repaired in a timely manner, the early anaesthesia should be purified, so as to reduce lung tissue infections and the occurrence of open aerobic chests, and so on.
pleural reaction
The pleural reaction is characterized by cough, dizziness, sweat, pale skin, cold limbs, etc. Some patients can also suffer from signs of trance, mental disorders, etc. In the event of a pleural reaction during a pleural perforation, the puncture shall cease immediately, the patient shall be ordered to rest in the bed, take oxygen, monitor blood pressure, pulse, blood sugar, dementia, etc.
(ii) Rare risks
1. Air embolisms
Air embolisms are rare. During pulmonary puncture, care must be taken that the location is accurate and that the needle is in an empty hole before the drug is injected; that the puncture needle is applied quickly, and the patient is required to hold his or her breath, and that the needle reaches an empty hole and is able to breathe calmly; that the emptiness of the injection is moderate, and that a quick injection can cause the patient to cough severely, and that a small amount of Lidoca is injected before the injection to prevent the strong cough after the injection; and that the injection is followed by another confirmation of the presence of the drug in the hole and the observation of the presence of the air chest.
2. Injection
There is a low rate of needle transfer, but there is still some risk. There are no clear data on the exact incidence of needle transfer.
3. Infections
The risk of infection following skin piercing is relatively low. Antibiotic anti-infection treatment may be considered under the guidance of a doctor in cases of post-operative coronal or lung infections.
Overall, although there are risks, most of the risks can be controlled and addressed with rigorous mastery of adaptive and regulatory practices.
III. Relationship between skin puncture and tumour transfer
(i) Lung cancer puncture and transfer
There is a risk of cancer cell proliferation from lung cancer perforation, but the risk is low. Access to the relevant information shows approximately 0.3 per cent. There are fewer opportunities for cancer cells to spread through the active test of the tube, as the core cutting cancer tissue enters the syringe, making it difficult to cause needle transfer. The pulmonary piercing is mainly directed at pleural pathologies of an undetermined nature, intrapulmonary edema in the vicinity of the chest wall or bronchial tube, infectious pathologies of the lung for unknown causes, as well as incongrumental and pulmonary door pathologies of undiagnosed diagnosis. Although the incidence is low, puncture must be followed. Before piercing, you need to locate the tumor and try to do it as successfully as possible.
(ii) Hepatic puncture and transfer
The tumours are less likely to spread as a result of the larvae of the liver. PTCD sting therapy does not generally cause the spread of tumours because it is mainly applied to tumours in the cholesterol, which divide tumours in the larvae, tumours in the middle or high tumours in the clarinet, and tumours in the pancreas. These tumours do not pass through the tumours during the piercing process, so that they do not reach them and do not spread or spread.
(iii) Other piercing and diversion
There is also a risk of tumour transfer for skin piercing in other areas, but overall the risk is low. In the case of skin piercing in other areas, the doctor also selects, on a case-by-case basis, the appropriate piercing path and method to minimize the risk of tumour transfer. At the same time, after piercing, changes in the patient ‘ s condition are closely observed, if handled in an exceptional and timely manner.
In conclusion, although there is, to some extent, a risk of tumour transfer from perforation, this risk can be controlled and reduced with a strict mastery of adaptive certificates and regulatory practices. IV. SCIENTIFIC PERFECT
Skin piercing is of irreplaceable importance in the diagnosis of tumours. It provides doctors with accurate pathological information, helps to identify the nature, type and stage of tumours and provides a critical basis for subsequent treatment programming.
However, when faced with skin piercing, patients tend to be afraid and hesitant for fear of risks such as tumour transfer. In fact, although there is a certain risk of perforation, as noted above, the risk of tumour transfer can be controlled and reduced with strict control of adaptive certificates and regulatory practices.
According to statistics, the risk of tumour transfer after pneumoconiosis is about 0.3%, a very low probability. Moreover, as medical technology continues to improve, doctors take various measures to reduce the risk of perforation.
The risk of perforation should therefore be viewed rationally. When a doctor recommends a skin piercing, it should not be blindly rejected, but should be fully informed of the need for and safety of a skin piercing, and should communicate fully with the doctor to make the best decision for himself. At the same time, the patient should cooperate closely with the doctor ‘ s observation and treatment after the puncture, and provide timely feedback on the anomalies so that the doctor can deal with them in a timely manner.
In general, perforation is an important tumour diagnostic method, and although there is a risk, the risk can be controlled and reduced with a rigorous mastery of adaptive certificates and regulatory practices. Patients should look scientifically at skin piercing, actively cooperate with doctors in their diagnosis and treatment and be responsible for their own health.
